Skip to main content

Man of Steel

Many times, the hype cannot match a film’s ambitions or overall product. Man of Steel is one such film. For the second year in a row, I come away disappointed by a comic film that looked spectacular in every way, just like I did with Batman last year. 
            Then again, Man of Steel is the superhero film that really defines this era of filmmaking. Money buys visuals, visuals make money, story is shorthanded. The visuals in this film were absolutely spectacular, but there was SO much, more than I could handle. Too much of a good thing is not a good thing, and that’s what happened here. Too much. 
            Granted, this is Snyder’s best film to date and the coming out party for Henry Cavill but it remains to be an all ecompassing film. There are portions where you will be wowed, that’s a guarantee. However, there will be parts where you are scratching your head in confusion or frustration. The story is basic, and that’s all I can really say. Other than the main characters, you really could care less about everything else. There’s no sense of wholeness there, so when things happen, there is no true emotional connection.
            Cavill is a solid Superman, an upgrade from Brandon Routh in every sense of the word. But he struggles to bring a warmth and charm to the character. A couple crucial moments in the film for him I almost teared up, but he has a bright future in the franchise.
            No one else is really spectacular in the film, but I’ll tell you what is: Han’s Zimmer awesome ass soundtrack.  It will blow you way. That I can guarantee.

            The film is one you could see, but it won’t blow you away. Man of Steel is a solid addition to the Superman franchise, and promises a bright future ahead.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Tree of Life

Terrence Malick’s The Tree of Life is a hugely ambitious picture that not only deals with a family’s life here on earth, but the creation of our own and the beiiefs, religious or secular,   we grasp as the clear and definite truth.   The scope of Malick’s film is transcendental to our culture. ·       The film begins a child’s death and a family’s struggle to grasp this grievous concept.   We see them look back at life and how their relationships with one another has grown or decreased over the years.   The family is upheld by two parents.   The mother represents Grace, the kind and loving side of life, while the father represents Nature, the mentality that you must get ahead and do whatever you can to survive in this dog eat dog world of ours.   We see the children having to decide what side of life they want.   The main character, Jack, struggles with these natures.   He does not know which one to take hold of.   The film jumps from his childhood to present times, where

Skyfall Review

Daniel Craig. Javier Bardem.  Judi Dench.  Ralph Fiennes. Sam Mendes.  Roger Deakins.  Thomas Newman. All modern legends in their own right in the filmmaking industry.  You would think their new film, yeah not any film, a Bond film, would blow you away, wouldn't you?  Not today, not today. Skyfall was a film that had so much promise. So much.  And yet, it took a step back following in the footsteps of Quantum of Solace. Skyfall follows Bond as he is to retrieve a drive that contains all agents hidden in terrorist organizations across the world.  He can't find it and the chase pursues.  It ends on a train, where M orders an agent to shoot a man Bond is fighting.  She shoots, and hits Bond.  The rest of the film follows M16 and M, limping out with out Bond, hoping to stay afloat.  But things get worse and worse, and low and behold, Bond comes back to save the day, and does, with a story that well, isn't Bond like at all really ( even less enticing than Q

The Night of The Hunter Review

   The Night of the Hunter is a classic for a reason. Kids my age should take note of what makes a classic classic, and why it has stood the test of time. This is unlike most of the films that come out today: Pointless and wallowing in their own mediocrity. Classic is something that others copy, others look to for guidance, one whose story and theme transcends the art form.  This is a film that has done all of the above (If you want to argue this, or debate it I should say, comment below).   The story is about a boy John and his sister Pearl. The movie opens with their father hiding 10 grand he stole, and telling the kids that no matter what, they would never tell where he hid it.  The kids promise and the dad goes off to prison. There he meets the Reverend Harry Powell, who finds out he has this money.  This now becomes his sole purpose. Find and take the money at any cost. It's a wife, 2 kids and her family. Who can really stop him?    The story is creepy, and one that you look